In my quest to move and re-think, I like to read. I read blogs, I read books, I subscribe to e-mail lists, and follow those who think differently on Facebook or YouTube. One recent addition to my list is the Verge Network. The basic premise of the folks at Verge is that God's idea for the church was not that it be a place that we go, but that church is a community of people with the same mission. While most churches would agree with those words, the ways we live and the ways we operate tell the truth about what we really believe the church is all about.
Anyway, signing up for their e-mail news letter has given me access to a huge list of free e-books, one of which is called ,Righteous Brood', by Hugh Halter. The e-mail discussing this free resource was particularly intriguing to me, and the book is only about 62 adobe reader pages long, so I set aside my Andy Stanley reading, and dove in.
At just about the half way point, Mr. Halter (who I occasionally disagree with) said something that really caught my attention. He was talking about the difference between Hope and Vision. Hopes, he argues, are "just emotional wishes that we hold out for. Vision on the other hand is designed to actually change the future... Vision is the ability to see what God wants and move people toward His desired goal in any situation"
I've been having a hard time with certain things in life, and I've been asked about certain situations, whether or not I have hope. Honestly I tend toward pessimism. Hope is something I have to work at. When 1st Corinthians 13 tells me that "love always hopes" I cringe a little and know I have lots of room to grow. But this quote resonates with me, because what I lack in hope, I make up for in Vision. I may be a pessimist when it comes to where things are, or where they will be if nothing changes, but I am always ready with ideas for how to make them different.
Personally I think it is hard to share hope, without sharing vision. When you tell a sick person 'I hope you feel better,' it is no where near as comforting as when their doctor says, 'here is the plan for how we are going to take you from sick to healthy.' One offers an "emotional wish" the other is "designed to actually change the future". Which one actually offers hope?
I think James talked about this in his epistle, when he said "if a brother or sister is poorly clothed and lacking daily food, and one of you says to them, 'Go in peace, be warmed and be filled,' without giving them the things needed for the body, what good is that?" Like empty words to an empty stomach is hope without vision.
So when we think of our kids, do we think, I hope they avoid tragedy, find a godly spouse, get a good job, settle into a safe neighborhood, find a good church etc.? Do we step it up a notch and 'hope' they will take risks for God and make a difference in the world? Or do we stop and think about how to make those things happen? Do we dare to ask God what his vision for our family is? Do we make the tough and uncomfortable choices that will result in those things becoming reality?
When we think of our churches, do we hope for unity, do we hope that people will act like a body, do we hope for more people to come to know Jesus, for lives to be changed, and the next generation to walk through the door? Or are we willing to come up with a vision that says, this is who we want to reach, this is how we plan to reach them, this is how we will disciple them, here are the steps that build faith, and here are some next steps each of us should be taking.
When we think of or marriages do we hope he will pick up his socks and she will make sure clean ones are mated? Do we hope for intimacy, for romance, for like-mindedness, and trust. Or do we come up with a plan do build those things brick by brick, in sickness and in health, in riches and in poverty, for better or worse.
When I have vision I have hope.
Where there is no vision, people perish.
No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments will be moderated before being posted.